Simply-supported beam — uniformly-distributed load#
Companion to Simply-supported beam — central point load and Cantilever beam — tip deflection under uniform distributed load —
same SS-beam geometry but with a uniformly-distributed
transverse load q instead of a central concentrated load.
The Euler–Bernoulli closed form is the familiar 5/384
coefficient:
Each support reaction is \(R = q L / 2\) by symmetry.
Problem#
Parameter |
Value |
|---|---|
Length |
1.0 m |
Cross-section |
0.05 m × 0.05 m (square) |
Young’s modulus |
200 GPa |
Distributed load |
1 000 N/m (acts in |
Expected |
|
femorph-solver result#
Ran by tests/validation/test_ss_beam_udl.py on an
SOLID185 enhanced-strain hex mesh. Same knife-edge supports
as the SS-beam-central-load problem; UDL lumped onto the top
face via the trapezoid-rule arc-length convention from
cantilever_udl. Total nodal resultant equals -q · L
exactly (regression-tested).
Refinement |
Mesh ( |
|
Error vs Euler–Bernoulli |
|---|---|---|---|
Coarse |
20 × 3 × 3 |
1.2509 × 10⁻⁴ |
+0.07 % |
Medium |
40 × 3 × 3 |
1.2555 × 10⁻⁴ |
+0.44 % |
Refined |
80 × 3 × 3 |
1.2570 × 10⁻⁴ |
+0.56 % |
The small ~0.5 % drift is the same 3D Poisson contribution the other SS / CC beam problems exhibit; smaller here than under a concentrated load because the UDL spreads the bending moment out and reduces the local-stress contribution at the load.
Cross-references#
Source |
Reported |
Problem ID / location |
|---|---|---|
Closed form (Euler–Bernoulli) |
1.250 × 10⁻⁴ |
Timoshenko SoM Part I §5.6 |
Gere & Goodno (2018) §9.3 Table 9-2 case 1 |
1.250 × 10⁻⁴ |
SS beam with UDL |
femorph-solver (refined) |
1.257 × 10⁻⁴ |
|
MAPDL Verification Manual |
1.25 × 10⁻⁴ |
VM-2 Beam stresses and deflections (UDL SS variant) |
Abaqus Verification Manual |
1.25 × 10⁻⁴ |
AVM 1.5.x SS-beam-UDL family |
NAFEMS Background to Benchmarks |
1.25 × 10⁻⁴ |
§3.2 SS beam under UDL |
Source#
Problem class:
femorph_solver.validation.problems.SimplySupportedBeamUDL.
Backing regression test:
tests/validation/test_ss_beam_udl.py.