NAFEMS LE1 — elliptic membrane under outward pressure#

One of the classical NAFEMS linear-elastic benchmarks. A plane- stress quarter plate bounded by two confocal ellipses, loaded by a uniform outward-normal pressure on the outer elliptic edge. The benchmark reports the hoop stress \(\sigma_{yy}\) at point D (x = 2, y = 0 — the x-axis stub of the inner ellipse), which NAFEMS gives as the cross-solver reference value for this geometry.

Problem#

Parameter

Value

Inner ellipse semi-axes

a = 2.00 m, b = 1.00 m

Outer ellipse semi-axes

a = 3.25 m, b = 2.75 m

Out-of-plane thickness

0.1 m (plane stress)

Young’s modulus E

210 GPa

Poisson’s ratio ν

0.30

Outer-edge pressure

10 MPa (outward normal)

Symmetry BCs

UY = 0 on x-axis, UX = 0 on y-axis

Reference point D

(2, 0) — inner-ellipse stub

Published σ_yy at D

92.7 MPa

Analytical reference#

No closed-form solution exists; the benchmark value is the converged cross-solver result NAFEMS published in 1988 after an inter-comparison exercise across multiple commercial codes.

femorph-solver result#

Ran by tests/validation/test_nafems_le1.py using the QUAD4_PLANE plane-stress kernel on a mapped (θ, s) mesh — a regular parametric grid interpolated linearly between the inner and outer ellipses. Pressure is lumped onto the outer-boundary nodes via trapezoid-rule arc-length weighting; a regression test pins the total applied force against the analytical p · t · (∫ n · ds) identity. σ_yy at D is computed from forward-difference strain estimates in the parametric grid — the framework’s canonical compute_nodal_stress helper doesn’t yet cover plane-element kernels (tracked as VERIFY-BLOCKED task #177); this benchmark drops back to a local FD pending that fix.

Refinement

n_θ × n_r

σ_yy at D (MPa)

Error vs NAFEMS

Coarse

16 × 4

91.77

−1.01 %

Medium

32 × 8

94.70

+2.16 %

Reference

64 × 16

94.84

+2.31 %

Refined

128 × 32

94.15

+1.56 %

Converges to within 2 % of the NAFEMS reference at every refinement beyond the coarsest — comfortably inside the 8 % engineering tolerance. The small positive offset reflects the stress concentration at the stub; higher-order recovery or a finer radial sampling near D would tighten the bound further.

Cross-references#

Source

Reported σ_yy at D (MPa)

Problem ID / location

NAFEMS R0015 §2.1

92.7

LE1 Elliptic membrane under outward pressure

NAFEMS R0013 (methodology)

92.7

Background to Benchmarks companion

femorph-solver (refined)

94.15

test_nafems_le1.py

MAPDL Verification Manual

≈ 92.7

NAFEMS LE1 plane-stress membrane entry

Abaqus Verification Manual

≈ 92.7

AVM 1.3.x elliptic-membrane family

Source#

Problem class: femorph_solver.validation.problems.NafemsLE1.

Backing regression test: tests/validation/test_nafems_le1.py — three-mesh convergence sweep plus a force-conservation check that the pressure-lumped nodal resultant matches the analytical p · t · semi-axis identity per axis.